Harrow v. State

216 N.E.2d 28, 17 N.Y.2d 619

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

17 N.Y.2d 619 (1966)

Eric Harrow, an Infant, by Leonard Harrow, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 35293.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 15, 1966. Decided March 24, 1966.

Benjamin Frank for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

17 N.Y.2d 619 (1966)

Eric Harrow, an Infant, by Leonard Harrow, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 35293.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 15, 1966. Decided March 24, 1966.

Benjamin Frank for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Harrow v. State, 216 N.E.2d 28, 17 N.Y.2d 619 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

216 N.E.2d 28 (Harrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. State

110 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Killeen v. State

104 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)