Harrow v. Harrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrow v. Harrow

281 A.D. 848, 119 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3521

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 848 (Harrow v. Harrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrow v. Harrow, 281 A.D. 848, 119 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a husband against a wife to recover chattels, she counterclaimed to recover a sum of money, based on an alleged written agreement by the husband to pay certain sums for the support of the wife and their child, and on the obligation imposed on the husband by law to furnish necessaries for their support. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the counterclaim, which was made on the grounds that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that it failed separately to state and number the separate causes contained therein. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The counterclaim is sufficient to state a cause of action for some relief. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a husband against a wife to recover chattels, she counterclaimed to recover a sum of money, based on an alleged written agreement by the husband to pay certain sums for the support of the wife and their child, and on the obligation imposed on the husband by law to furnish necessaries for their support. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the counterclaim, which was made on the grounds that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that it failed separately to state and number the separate causes contained therein. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The counterclaim is sufficient to state a cause of action for some relief. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 848, 119 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrow-v-harrow-nyappdiv-1953.