Harrow v. Britton

209 F.2d 303, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 128, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3834
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 1953
Docket11304
StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 303 (Harrow v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrow v. Britton, 209 F.2d 303, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 128, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3834 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case concerns a claim for compensation under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Law. 1 Our present appellant filed a claim alleging that subsequent to July 15, 1946, she had suffered disability resulting from an injury incurred March 12, 1946. After hearing, the Deputy Commissioner made a finding of fact “that subsequent to July 9, 1946 the claimant has suffered no disability attributable to the injury of March 12, 1946”. We have examined the record as a whole and find ample evidence to support that finding. That is as far as our authority permits us to go. 2

Affirmed.

1

. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424 (1927), 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., as made applicable to the District of Columbia by Act of May 17, 1928, 45 Stat. 600, D.C. Code § 36-501 (1951), 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 note.

2

. O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 1951, 340 U.S. 504, 71 S.Ct. 470, 95 L.Ed. 483.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.
340 U.S. 504 (Supreme Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 F.2d 303, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 128, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrow-v-britton-cadc-1953.