Harroun v. Graham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Harroun v. Graham

101 A. 985, 258 Pa. 245, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 828

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 14, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 126

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A. 985 (Harroun v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harroun v. Graham, 101 A. 985, 258 Pa. 245, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 828 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per- Curiam,

There was. sufficient evidence to warrant the learned chancellor in finding, as he did, “that there was no actual delivery of the deeds in question by the grantor to the grantees named therein in the lifetime of the grantor, but they were retained in the possession and under the control of the grantor.” This was the controlling question in the case, and, having been found in favor of the plaintiffs, a decree was properly entered against the defendants.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per- Curiam,

There was. sufficient evidence to warrant the learned chancellor in finding, as he did, “that there was no actual delivery of the deeds in question by the grantor to the grantees named therein in the lifetime of the grantor, but they were retained in the possession and under the control of the grantor.” This was the controlling question in the case, and, having been found in favor of the plaintiffs, a decree was properly entered against the defendants.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A. 985, 258 Pa. 245, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harroun-v-graham-pa-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack