Harrop v. Campbell

618 P.2d 321, 101 Idaho 580, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 572
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided September 26, 1980·No. No. 13147·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appellants appeal from a district court summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for damages. Plaintiff Thelma Harrop was injured while descending the front steps of defendants’ home after having made a social and religious visit. The trial court concluded that there were no material issues of fact and, based upon the record presented below, ruled that the plaintiffs were “licensees” as a matter of law, relying on our decision in Wilson v. Bogert, 81 Idaho 535, 347 P.2d 341 (1959). The court further ruled that the defendants “violated no duty owed to plaintiffs.”

We affirm. Springer v. Pearson, 96 Idaho 477, 531 P.2d 567 (1975). Costs to respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrop v. Campbell, 618 P.2d 321, 101 Idaho 580, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 572 (Idaho 1980).

618 P.2d 321 (Harrop v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Springer v. Pearson
531 P.2d 567 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)
Wilson v. Bogert
347 P.2d 341 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1959)