Harrold v. State

233 S.W.3d 231, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2007 WL 2702177
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2007·No. ED 88387·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ricky L. Harrold, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because his counsel misinformed him about his sentence.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrold v. State, 233 S.W.3d 231, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2007 WL 2702177 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

233 S.W.3d 231 (Harrold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Marriage of King
233 S.W.3d 231 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)