Harrold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harrold v. State

233 S.W.3d 231, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2007 WL 2702177

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 18, 2007

DocketED 88387

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 S.W.3d 231 (Harrold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrold v. State, 233 S.W.3d 231, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2007 WL 2702177 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ricky L. Harrold, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because his counsel misinformed him about his sentence.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ricky L. Harrold, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his guilty plea was not voluntarily and intelligently made because his counsel misinformed him about his sentence.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 S.W.3d 231, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2007 WL 2702177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrold-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack