Harrod v. State
513 S.W.2d 471, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680
Opinion
The sufficiency of the complaint, verification of the information, and sufficiency of the trial evidence, are not subject to attack in Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceedings. The judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrod v. State, 513 S.W.2d 471, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974).
513 S.W.2d 471 (Harrod v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Achter v. State
545 S.W.2d 83 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)