Harrod v. State
513 S.W.2d 471, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680
This text of 513 S.W.2d 471 (Harrod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harrod v. State, 513 S.W.2d 471, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974).
Opinion
The sufficiency of the complaint, verification of the information, and sufficiency of the trial evidence, are not subject to attack in Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceedings. The judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Achter v. State
545 S.W.2d 83 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
513 S.W.2d 471, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrod-v-state-moctapp-1974.