Harrod v. Baumgardner

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 22, 2009
• Docket: 09-7379
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7379

DARRYL HARROD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DAN BAUMGARDNER; DEBBIE CESSNA; R. EICHELBURGER; H. R. MICHAEL, Officer; ALLISON NARDI, Nurse,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA

Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-03299-DKC)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl Harrod appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Harrod v. Baumgardner, No. 8:08-cv-03299-DKC (D. Md.

filed July 14, 2009, entered July 15, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED