Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r

33 Ala. 258
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

STONE, J.—

The agreement to forbear in this ease, made between plaintiff’s attorney and the administrator in chief, is, perhaps, a sufficient consideration to uphold the promise made by Mr. Craig to pay the demand 1st January, 1855, and would probably bind him personally. It is not, however, necessary to settle this question absolutely. We think the evidence, if believed, established presentation; and the credibility of the testimony was fairly submitted to the jury.—Code, § 1888; Pollard v. Scears, 28 Ala. 484.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r, 33 Ala. 258 (Ala. 1858).

33 Ala. 258 (Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Love
167 So. 703 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Smith v. Fellows
58 Ala. 467 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Clark v. Washington
44 Ala. 291 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1870)