Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r

Supreme Court of Alabama

Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r

33 Ala. 258

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 Ala. 258 (Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison's Adm'r v. Jones' Adm'r, 33 Ala. 258 (Ala. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.—

The agreement to forbear in this ease, made between plaintiff’s attorney and the administrator in chief, is, perhaps, a sufficient consideration to uphold the promise made by Mr. Craig to pay the demand 1st January, 1855, and would probably bind him personally. It is not, however, necessary to settle this question absolutely. We think the evidence, if believed, established presentation; and the credibility of the testimony was fairly submitted to the jury.—Code, § 1888; Pollard v. Scears, 28 Ala. 484.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.—

The agreement to forbear in this ease, made between plaintiff’s attorney and the administrator in chief, is, perhaps, a sufficient consideration to uphold the promise made by Mr. Craig to pay the demand 1st January, 1855, and would probably bind him personally. It is not, however, necessary to settle this question absolutely. We think the evidence, if believed, established presentation; and the credibility of the testimony was fairly submitted to the jury.—Code, § 1888; Pollard v. Scears, 28 Ala. 484.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ala. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrisons-admr-v-jones-admr-ala-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack