Harrison v. Woodward

Fourth Circuit

Harrison v. Woodward

538 F. App'x 300

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1500

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 F. App'x 300 (Harrison v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Woodward, 538 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders dismissing this civil rights action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Woodward, No. 3:13-cv-00131-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 & Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders dismissing this civil rights action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Woodward, No. 3:13-cv-00131-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 & Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 F. App'x 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-woodward-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack