Harrison v. Vermont Manganese Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Harrison v. Vermont Manganese Co.

1 Misc. 402, 20 N.Y.S. 894, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 873

DecidedDecember 15, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Misc. 402 (Harrison v. Vermont Manganese Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Vermont Manganese Co., 1 Misc. 402, 20 N.Y.S. 894, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $276.78, and is for services claimed to have been performed by the plaintiff in the month of September, 1889, for the defendant. The defendant’s organization sprang into existence in March or April, 1889, that being the date of the charter under which the incorporation met. The purposes of the organization are fully set out in the evidence. Among its incorporators were W. W. Flanagan, who was also connected with another company, a Mr. Russell P. Hoyt, who was elected its president shortly after the first meeting of the incorporators, and a James Gwatkin, another incorporator, who was secretary. About August 27, 1889, at the request of some of these incorporators, the plaintiff was directed to call a meeting of the shareholders of the defendant, which was done by the plaintiff, and such meeting took place on September 16, 1889, and the organization then, so far as the election of its officers and the performance of some other routine business, was com[403]*403pleted. Defendant had, from the time of the granting of the charter, become a corporation for all intents and purposes. Its incorporators would be liable from that time for all acts whether it had a president or other officer. The officers are only the medium through which it acts, and the incorporators could delegate its power to any of its members or require all to act together. The services performed were clearly for the benefit of the defendant and were accepted by its incorporators. Hooker v. Eagle Bank of Rochester, 30 N. Y. 83.

It was on the authority of all the officers. The defendant having, by its motion to dismiss at the close of the case, left the matter with the court, and the plaintiff thereupon having moved for a direction in his favor, the question became one of fact for the court. From the evidence in the case, we find no error, and think the judgment was properly rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs.

McGowan, P. J., and Van Wyok, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $276.78, and is for services claimed to have been performed by the plaintiff in the month of September, 1889, for the defendant. The defendant’s organization sprang into existence in March or April, 1889, that being the date of the charter under which the incorporation met. The purposes of the organization are fully set out in the evidence. Among its incorporators were W. W. Flanagan, who was also connected with another company, a Mr. Russell P. Hoyt, who was elected its president shortly after the first meeting of the incorporators, and a James Gwatkin, another incorporator, who was secretary. About August 27, 1889, at the request of some of these incorporators, the plaintiff was directed to call a meeting of the shareholders of the defendant, which was done by the plaintiff, and such meeting took place on September 16, 1889, and the organization then, so far as the election of its officers and the performance of some other routine business, was com[403]*403pleted. Defendant had, from the time of the granting of the charter, become a corporation for all intents and purposes. Its incorporators would be liable from that time for all acts whether it had a president or other officer. The officers are only the medium through which it acts, and the incorporators could delegate its power to any of its members or require all to act together. The services performed were clearly for the benefit of the defendant and were accepted by its incorporators. Hooker v. Eagle Bank of Rochester, 30 N. Y. 83.

It was on the authority of all the officers. The defendant having, by its motion to dismiss at the close of the case, left the matter with the court, and the plaintiff thereupon having moved for a direction in his favor, the question became one of fact for the court. From the evidence in the case, we find no error, and think the judgment was properly rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and, therefore, should be affirmed, with costs.

McGowan, P. J., and Van Wyok, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Misc. 402, 20 N.Y.S. 894, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-vermont-manganese-co-nynyccityct-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack