Harrison v. Stevens
7 Wend. 519
This text of 7 Wend. 519 (Harrison v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harrison v. Stevens, 7 Wend. 519 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
Opinion
By the Court,
Here is ordinary diligence. It is not required that an attorney should immediately on the adjournment of a circuit give notice of motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, and where notice is given within 10 or 12 days after the close of the circuit, no excuse for delay is necessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Wend. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-stevens-nysupct-1832.