Harrison v. State

262 S.W. 488, 97 Tex. Crim. 540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 Tex. Crim. 385
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 21, 1924·No. No. 8134.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of San Jacinto County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is without bills of exception, and it is only argued before us that the facts failed to show guilt. Officers went to appellant’s house with a search warrant and found in his kitchen behind the stove a barrel of soured mash and hidden under the floor a used still and in various places a large number of bottles each containing the odor of whisky and some of them a small quantity of it. According to the testimony of one of the officers appellant admitted to him that he had been making whisky with the mash and apparatus found. This seems to fully meet the demands of the law, and believing that it supports the verdict of the jury, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. State, 262 S.W. 488, 97 Tex. Crim. 540 (Tex. 1924).

262 S.W. 488 (Harrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.