Harrison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harrison v. State

698 So. 2d 379, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 1997 WL 525592

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 1997

DocketNo. 96-02035

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 698 So. 2d 379 (Harrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. State, 698 So. 2d 379, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 1997 WL 525592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mr. Harrison’s conviction and sentence for committing a sexual battery on a child less than twelve years old. We strike the $2 court cost because Mr. Harrison was not given notice of the imposition of this discretionary cost under section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). The trial court also erred in failing to give Mr. Harrison notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, Mr. Harrison shall have thirty days from the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the hen. See id. at 839.

PARKER, C.J., and ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Mr. Harrison’s conviction and sentence for committing a sexual battery on a child less than twelve years old. We strike the $2 court cost because Mr. Harrison was not given notice of the imposition of this discretionary cost under section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). The trial court also erred in failing to give Mr. Harrison notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, Mr. Harrison shall have thirty days from the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the hen. See id. at 839.

PARKER, C.J., and ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 So. 2d 379, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9707, 1997 WL 525592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack