Harrison v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Harrison v. State

203 S.W.3d 122, 360 Ark. 597

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 10, 2005

DocketCR 05-64

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 S.W.3d 122 (Harrison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. State, 203 S.W.3d 122, 360 Ark. 597 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Raye Lynn Harrison, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Kara Bideler Moore, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Raye Lynn Harrison, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Kara Bideler Moore, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 S.W.3d 122, 360 Ark. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-state-ark-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack