Harrison v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Harrison v. State

203 S.W.3d 122, 360 Ark. 597

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 10, 2005·No. CR 05-64·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Raye Lynn Harrison, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Kara Bideler Moore, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Raye Lynn Harrison, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Kara Bideler Moore, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Harrison v. State, 203 S.W.3d 122, 360 Ark. 597 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

203 S.W.3d 122 (Harrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related