Harrison v. State

118 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 260
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 1928·No. 4 Div. 446.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The evidence adduced upon this trial in the court below, as shown by the record, has been read and considered by this court en banc. The affirmative charge was requested in writing and refused. This court is of the opinion-that there was error in the refusal of said charge, as the evidence as a whole was insufficient; to sustain the burden of proof resting upon the state and to overcome the presumption of innocence which attended the accused. We are of the opinion, so far as the charges contained in the indictment are concerned, that the evidence hardly creates even a suspicion against this appellant. A conviction cannot be permitted to stand upon such evidence. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. State, 118 So. 924, 22 Ala. App. 673 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

118 So. 924 (Harrison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.