Harrison v. Shultz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Harrison v. Shultz

150 N.W. 1103, 97 Neb. 406, 1914 Neb. LEXIS 384

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 18, 1914

DocketNo. 17,927

StatusPublished

This text of 150 N.W. 1103 (Harrison v. Shultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Shultz, 150 N.W. 1103, 97 Neb. 406, 1914 Neb. LEXIS 384 (Neb. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnes, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for Madison county, setting aside and canceling a sheriff’s deed to lots 4 and 5, in Riverside Park addition to the city [407]*407of Norfolk. The appellants have filed no brief. The appellee filed no cross-appeal. Tbe case was submitted on the brief of appellee. Tbe evidence contained in tbe bill of exceptions appears to be sufficient to support tbe findings and decree.

Tbe judgment of tbe district court is

Affirmed.

Letton, Eose and Fawcett, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for Madison county, setting aside and canceling a sheriff’s deed to lots 4 and 5, in Riverside Park addition to the city [407]*407of Norfolk. The appellants have filed no brief. The appellee filed no cross-appeal. Tbe case was submitted on the brief of appellee. Tbe evidence contained in tbe bill of exceptions appears to be sufficient to support tbe findings and decree.

Tbe judgment of tbe district court is

Affirmed.

Letton, Eose and Fawcett, JJ., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.W. 1103, 97 Neb. 406, 1914 Neb. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-shultz-neb-1914.