Harrison v. Sauerwein

30 N.W. 571, 70 Iowa 291
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 13, 1886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Seevers, J.

I The plaintiff is the holder of the patent title to the land in controversy, and the defendants claim 1. tax sale evidence of lore saiei be under a tax deed, which the plaintiff claims is invalid, for the reason that the taxes had been paid prior to the sale for delinquent taxes. The land was sold in 1867 for the taxes of 1866, and in 1871 the treasurer conveyed the land in controversy to one of the defendants. The plaintiff, conceding that the deed was presumptive evidence that the taxes had not been paid prior to the sale, assumed the burden of proving they had been'paid. For this purpose he introduced in evidence so much of the tax list or duplicate of 1866 as refers to the land in controversy. It is as follows:

Taxes foe Teae 1866.
hoAq4UQsxgC1iLquRBeBkzID6YLVjD5YHugYm1O5LbUJ555WxRTicArzRQ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Sauerwein, 30 N.W. 571, 70 Iowa 291 (iowa 1886).

30 N.W. 571 (Harrison v. Sauerwein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wren v. Berry
243 N.W. 375 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1932)
Warner v. Tullis
218 N.W. 575 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
King v. Bolt
130 N.W. 818 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Carter v. Cemansky
102 N.W. 438 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Cornoy v. Wetmore
60 N.W. 245 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)