Harrison v. Oakley

Fourth Circuit

Harrison v. Oakley

328 F. App'x 847

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2009·No. No. 08-7240·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Harrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Oakley, No. 1:07-cv-02468-RDB (D. Md. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Harrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Oakley, No. 1:07-cv-02468-RDB (D. Md. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harrison v. Oakley, 328 F. App'x 847 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 847 (Harrison v. Oakley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related