Harrison v. Oakley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 9, 2009
• Docket: 08-7240
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7240

MICHAEL HARRISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCOTT OAKLEY, IGO; JOHN A. ROWLEY, Commissioner; VICTORIA BURKHARD, Assistant Commissioner; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; RAZAAK ENIOLA, M.D.; LYNN COLE, Regional Manager; DOCTOR MATHIS,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE, Regional Manager; JOHN DOE, Previous Site Administrator,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02468-RDB)

Submitted: June 17, 2009 Decided: July 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Lisa J. Russell, Larry Michael Waranch, WARANCH & BROWN, LLC, Lutherville, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Michael Harrison appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Harrison v. Oakley, No. 1:07-cv-02468-RDB (D. Md. June

25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED