Harrison v. LaBeff
This text of 198 A.D.2d 829 (Harrison v. LaBeff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. At oral argument, plaintiffs conceded that defendant did not own the adjacent property where plaintiff Nancy J. Harrison fell. Plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant exercised control over that property (see, Dunn v Reardon, 184 AD2d 1064; McGill v Caldors, Inc., 135 AD2d 1041). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 A.D.2d 829, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-labeff-nyappdiv-1993.