Harrison v. Kapp
85 S.E.2d 337, 241 N.C. 408, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 374
Opinion
The plaintiff’s showing that she entered the intersection first, that she was on the right and the defendants on her left, is sufficient to survive the motion for nonsuit and take the case to the jury. G-.S. 20-155. As is customary in reversing a nonsuit, we refrain from discussing the evidence, except to the extent necessary to show the reason for the conclusion reached.
Beversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrison v. Kapp, 85 S.E.2d 337, 241 N.C. 408, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 374 (N.C. 1955).
85 S.E.2d 337 (Harrison v. Kapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tucker v. Moorefield
108 S.E.2d 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Wilson v. Camp
107 S.E.2d 743 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Price v. Gray
97 S.E.2d 844 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Goldston v. RANDOLPH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
95 S.E.2d 455 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Caudle v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
88 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)