Harrison v. Hunter

1 Del. Cas. 138, 1797 Del. LEXIS 14
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 28, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 138 (Harrison v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. Hunter, 1 Del. Cas. 138, 1797 Del. LEXIS 14 (Del. Super. Ct. 1797).

Opinion

Bassett, C. J.,

gave no opinion on the motion, he having drawn the declaration, but he charged the jury (which see in my notes) 1

Johns, J.

We overrule the reasons in arrest of judgment. The verdict certainly cures the defect, for it is only ambiguity; [139]*139if the points are changed, the sense will be altered. Cowp. 826. Though the verdict will not aid the want of a matter of fact not laid, yet it will cure matter of form.

Rodney, J., accordant.

Judgment final.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 138, 1797 Del. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-hunter-delctcompl-1797.