Harrison v. Hull

1 Hopk. Ch. 112
New York Court of Chancery·Decided March 26, 1824·Published

Opinion

The Court

thought no notice was necessary. The rehearing in cases under this rule, is of course, and can not be opposed. Neither will the court grant an order to suspend proceedings before the master. The Rehearing suspends them of course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Hull, 1 Hopk. Ch. 112 (N.Y. 1824).

1 Hopk. Ch. 112 (Harrison v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.