Harrison v. Hull
1 Hopk. Ch. 112
This text of 1 Hopk. Ch. 112 (Harrison v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harrison v. Hull, 1 Hopk. Ch. 112 (N.Y. 1824).
Opinion
thought no notice was necessary. The rehearing in cases under this rule, is of course, and can not be opposed. Neither will the court grant an order to suspend proceedings before the master. The Rehearing suspends them of course.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Hopk. Ch. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-hull-nychanct-1824.