Harrison v. Holley
This text of 46 Ala. 84 (Harrison v. Holley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.
The summons was not signed by the clerk. The judgment entry recites that the plaintiff [85]*85came by his attorney, “ and the counsel of the defendant ask leave to withdraw their appearance, which is granted, and the defendant being called, came not, but made default.” The appeal is taken upon the record, and the above is all that is stated in reference to the appearance of the defendant. It was not the defendant’s appearance that was withdrawn. This he might have done without leave. The counsel withdrew their appearance for him. The plaintiff was present and took his judgment by default without requiring any explanation of the condition in which his ease was to be placed. The only conclusion to which we can come, is that the appearance of counsel for the defendant was improperly entered, and on that account was withdrawn. A summons not signed by the clerk, will not support a judgment by default.— Winnemore v. Mathews, January term, 1871.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Ala. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-holley-ala-1871.