Harrison v. Herbel

281 F. App'x 236
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2008·No. 07-7748·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Henry Harrison appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing this action arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Freedom of Information Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 (2000), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and North Carolina state law; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Herbel, No. 5:05-ct-00550-D (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2007; filed Oct. 10, entered Oct. 11, 2007; Nov. 6, 2007; Mar. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Herbel, 281 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2008).

281 F. App'x 236 (Harrison v. Herbel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrison v. Lutheran Medical Center
468 F. App'x 33 (Second Circuit, 2012)