Harrison v. Harrison
This text of 186 S.E.2d 884 (Harrison v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted a former husband in an action by the wife wherein she sought an increase in periodic alimony payments. The divorce decree included a contract between the parties which provided for a property settlement and monthly alimony payments to the wife. This contract, which was also attached as an exhibit to the motion for summary judgment, provided in part: "Except as herein provided, neither party shall have any claim against the other for any reason whatsoever.” Held:
This language is equally as strong as the language held in Grizzard v. Grizzard, 224 Ga. 42 (159 SE2d 400) and Ferris v. Ferris, 227 Ga. 465 (181 SE2d 371), to bar any increase in monthly alimony payments. Under such decisions, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the former husband’s motion for summary judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 S.E.2d 884, 228 Ga. 564, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-harrison-ga-1972.