Harrison v. H. Moss & Co.

41 La. Ann. 239
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1889
DocketNo. 10,329
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 La. Ann. 239 (Harrison v. H. Moss & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. H. Moss & Co., 41 La. Ann. 239 (La. 1889).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appear.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

Numerous creditors attached and sequestrated tlie merchandise of the defendants, claiming privileges therein on the property attached and sequestrated for the amount sued for in each case.

The above cases, on motion, were consolidated for convenience of trial.

[240]*240The evidence in each case was introduced separately and a separate judgment was rendered in each ease.

The appellants, who also were seizing creditors, were made defendants in the other suits by other seizing creditors.

The plaintiffs in the consolidated suits obtained an order for the separate appraisement and sale of the merchandise seized in each suit, and it was so appraised and sold. It was agreed between the parties that the goods seized under the several writs of attachment and sequestration should be sold under an order obtained in one of the suits and that the proceeds of the sale should remain in the hands of the sheriff, “ subject to the claims, rights and liens of the various alleged creditors,” and that all parties having obtained orders for separate appraisements and sale of merchandise should be considered as having obtained orders in the case. The merchandise realized over ten thousand dollars and the apx>ellants have claims amounting to over twelve thousand dollars.

The contest was over the amount of the proceeds realized from the sale of the goods seized in each suit.

The matter in dispute in each case is less than two thousand dollars.

It is clear that by consolidating the suits for the purpose of trial, the aggregate amount being over two thousand dollars, can not give this court jurisdiction.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Nunez v. Baynard
14 So. 2d 611 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1943)
Taylor v. American Bank & Trust Co.
135 So. 47 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)
Hotard v. Perilloux
107 So. 515 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Alessi v. Town of Independence
76 So. 792 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 La. Ann. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-h-moss-co-la-1889.