Harrison v. Grubb
This text of 567 So. 2d 56 (Harrison v. Grubb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the order dismissing the appellant’s second amended complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend, but reverse the award of attorneys’ fees to the appellee pursuant to section 57.105, Florida [57]*57Statutes (1987). The trial court’s order is deficient “because it contains no finding ... regarding a complete absence of a jus-ticiable issue.” Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501, 506 (Fla.1982). On remand, the trial court may reimpose these fees only if it makes the necessary findings.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
567 So. 2d 56, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7361, 1990 WL 140293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-grubb-fladistctapp-1990.