Harrison v. Griswold

Connecticut Superior Court

Harrison v. Griswold

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 50

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1935

DocketFile No. 32600

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 50 (Harrison v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Griswold, 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 50 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The action is one of fraud and the only question involved, apparently, is whether the judgment *Page 51 will support a body execution in view of the fact it was entered by stipulation.

It was said in Shaw vs. Spelke, 110 Conn. 208, at 215, "a judgment by consent is in effect an admission by the parties that the decree is a just determination of their rights on the real facts of the case had they been found. It is ordinarily absolutely conclusive between the parties and cannot be appealed from or reviewed on a writ of error."

The stipulation is not one for the payment of money but that the issues be found for the plaintiffs and their damages fixed by judgment.

The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is one of fraud and the only question involved, apparently, is whether the judgment *Page 51 will support a body execution in view of the fact it was entered by stipulation.

It was said in Shaw vs. Spelke, 110 Conn. 208, at 215, "a judgment by consent is in effect an admission by the parties that the decree is a just determination of their rights on the real facts of the case had they been found. It is ordinarily absolutely conclusive between the parties and cannot be appealed from or reviewed on a writ of error."

The stipulation is not one for the payment of money but that the issues be found for the plaintiffs and their damages fixed by judgment.

The motion is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-griswold-connsuperct-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack