Harrison v. Gillespie

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. Gillespie. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 F.3d 888
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2010·No. 08-16602·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES M. HARRISON,  No. 08-16602 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

v.  2:08-cv-00802-RCJ-

DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, RJJ Respondent-Appellee.

 ORDER

Filed June 18, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Rawlinson and Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Gillespie, (9th Cir. 2010).

Harrison v. Gillespie (Harrison v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.