Harrison v. Garner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Harrison v. Garner

70 So. 700, 110 Miss. 586

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 So. 700 (Harrison v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Garner, 70 So. 700, 110 Miss. 586 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the testimony of appellants, the time for the payment of the note sued on was several times extended one year upon his agreement to pay interest thereon. The ease, therefore, is ruled by Moore v. Redding, 69 Miss. 846, 13 So. 849, and the instruction which eliminated from the consideration of the jury the defense of the sureties that they had been discharged by these extensions should not have been given.

Reversed and remanded„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the testimony of appellants, the time for the payment of the note sued on was several times extended one year upon his agreement to pay interest thereon. The ease, therefore, is ruled by Moore v. Redding, 69 Miss. 846, 13 So. 849, and the instruction which eliminated from the consideration of the jury the defense of the sureties that they had been discharged by these extensions should not have been given.

Reversed and remanded„

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 So. 700, 110 Miss. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-garner-miss-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack