Harrison v. Garner

Mississippi Supreme Court

Harrison v. Garner

70 So. 700, 110 Miss. 586

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the testimony of appellants, the time for the payment of the note sued on was several times extended one year upon his agreement to pay interest thereon. The ease, therefore, is ruled by Moore v. Redding, 69 Miss. 846, 13 So. 849, and the instruction which eliminated from the consideration of the jury the defense of the sureties that they had been discharged by these extensions should not have been given.

Reversed and remanded„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the testimony of appellants, the time for the payment of the note sued on was several times extended one year upon his agreement to pay interest thereon. The ease, therefore, is ruled by Moore v. Redding, 69 Miss. 846, 13 So. 849, and the instruction which eliminated from the consideration of the jury the defense of the sureties that they had been discharged by these extensions should not have been given.

Reversed and remanded„

Harrison v. Garner, 70 So. 700, 110 Miss. 586 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

70 So. 700 (Harrison v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related