Harrison v. Evans

11 F. Cas. 648, 1 Cranch 364
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 F. Cas. 648 (Harrison v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. Evans, 11 F. Cas. 648, 1 Cranch 364 (circtddc 1806).

Opinion

THE COURT, also,

(FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge,

absent,) at the prayer of the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury, in effect, that if the slave had a written authority from the plaintiff, without limitation of time or place, to seek for a new master, the plaintiff could not recover in this action, although such authority was not shown to the defendant or his agents.

Verdict for plaintiff, $180. New trial refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKagen v. Windham
38 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1901)
Miller v. Ford
38 S.C.L. 376 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 648, 1 Cranch 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-evans-circtddc-1806.