Harrison v. Evans
This text of 11 F. Cas. 648 (Harrison v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE COURT, also,
absent,) at the prayer of the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury, in effect, that if the slave had a written authority from the plaintiff, without limitation of time or place, to seek for a new master, the plaintiff could not recover in this action, although such authority was not shown to the defendant or his agents.
Verdict for plaintiff, $180. New trial refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 648, 1 Cranch 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-evans-circtddc-1806.