Harrison v. Ellmakfr

4 Rawle 162, 1833 Pa. LEXIS 16
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 12, 1833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Huston J.

This matter is too plain for argument. When a person applies to an officer to see a record, and only wishes to see it, or know if there is such a record, the fee bill gives the officer the fee for a search. When a person applies to an officer for a copy of a record, or a certificate of the date of a record, the officer must find the record, before he can make the copy, or give the certificate required. This search is for his own use and benefit; he makes the copy or gives the certificate; and is paid for so doing, and has no right to charge for a search. The words of the act are plain, cannot be mistaken, and ought not to be evaded.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Ellmakfr, 4 Rawle 162, 1833 Pa. LEXIS 16 (Pa. 1833).

4 Rawle 162 (Harrison v. Ellmakfr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonura v. Davidson
3 Pelt. 68 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)