Harrison v. Department of Corrections

965 So. 2d 1276, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262, 2007 WL 2981579
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 2007
Docket1D06-3915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 965 So. 2d 1276 (Harrison v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. Department of Corrections, 965 So. 2d 1276, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262, 2007 WL 2981579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

965 So.2d 1276 (2007)

Hobart Owen HARRISON, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

No. 1D06-3915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 15, 2007.

Hobart Owen Harrison, pro se, Petitioner.

*1277 Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee; Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner's argument that the circuit court erred in denying his petition for writ of mandamus is without merit and is rejected; however, because the underlying action constitutes a "collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court improperly imposed a lien upon petitioner's inmate trust account for payment of court costs and fees. See Brooks v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 948 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Spaziano v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D1597, ___ So.2d ___, 2006 WL 1565289 (Fla. 1st DCA June 9, 2006); Cox v. Crosby, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D310, ___ So.2d ___, 2006 WL 176681 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan.26, 2006), rev. granted sub nom., McDonough v. Cox, 924 So.2d 809 (Fla.2006); see also Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003). We accordingly quash that portion of the circuit court's order on indigency imposing a lien. The circuit court should direct the reimbursement of any funds that have been withdrawn from petitioner's account to satisfy the improper lien order.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED in part, GRANTED in part and REMANDED with directions to remove the lien from petitioner's inmate trust account.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Childers v. McDonough
965 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
965 So. 2d 1276, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262, 2007 WL 2981579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.