Harrison v. Crosby
88 S.E. 1102, 104 S.C. 350, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 128
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This case is controlled by the decision in Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S. C. 455, 74 S. E. 977, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, which has been reaffirmed in numerous cases, some of' which are cited in Givens v. Bank, 103 S. C. 174, 86 S. E. 24. See, also, Cannon v. Clarendon Hardware Co., 103 S. C. 538, 88 S. E. 284. The verdict should have been directed for plaintiff.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrison v. Crosby, 88 S.E. 1102, 104 S.C. 350, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 128 (S.C. 1916).
88 S.E. 1102 (Harrison v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farr-Barnes Lumber Co. v. Town of St. George
112 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
Merchants Nat. Bank v. Smith
96 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1918)