Harrison v. Crosby

88 S.E. 1102, 104 S.C. 350, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 128
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 13, 1916
Docket9379
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 1102 (Harrison v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison v. Crosby, 88 S.E. 1102, 104 S.C. 350, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 128 (S.C. 1916).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This case is controlled by the decision in Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S. C. 455, 74 S. E. 977, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, which has been reaffirmed in numerous cases, some of' which are cited in Givens v. Bank, 103 S. C. 174, 86 S. E. 24. See, also, Cannon v. Clarendon Hardware Co., 103 S. C. 538, 88 S. E. 284. The verdict should have been directed for plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Messrs. Justices Watts and Gage concur in the opinion announced. Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Fraser did not sit in this case, and did not participate in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farr-Barnes Lumber Co. v. Town of St. George
112 S.E. 24 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
Merchants Nat. Bank v. Smith
96 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 1102, 104 S.C. 350, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-crosby-sc-1916.