Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency

Fourth Circuit

Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency

390 F. App'x 205

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. No. 10-1510·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Judy Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency, No. 3:10-ev-00163-JRS (E.D.Va. Apr. 2, 2010). We deny Harrison’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Judy Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency, No. 3:10-ev-00163-JRS (E.D.Va. Apr. 2, 2010). We deny Harrison’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency, 390 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

390 F. App'x 205 (Harrison v. Central Intelligence Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related