Harrison v. Borough of Madison

81 A. 755, 82 N.J.L. 527, 53 Vroom 527, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harrison v. Borough of Madison. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 N.J.L. 21
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1911·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the view expressed by the Supreme Court that at the time of the adoption of the ordinance under review Mr. Downs was de facto mayor of the borough of Madison, acting under color of authority, and that his approval of the ordinance was therefore sufficient to give it validity.

We find it unnecessary to express an opinion upon the question whether he was de jure mayor.

The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Borough of Madison, 81 A. 755, 82 N.J.L. 527, 53 Vroom 527, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 755 (Harrison v. Borough of Madison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.