Harrison v. Bellnier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrison v. Bellnier

73 A.D.3d 1374, 900 N.Y.S.2d 697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.3d 1374 (Harrison v. Bellnier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Bellnier, 73 A.D.3d 1374, 900 N.Y.S.2d 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of harassment, refusing a direct order and having an untidy cell. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references [1375]*1375thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 surcharge restored to petitioner’s inmate account. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mercer v Artus, 70 AD3d 1073 [2010]; Matter of Rivera v Napoli, 69 AD3d 1284 [2010]).

Spain, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of harassment, refusing a direct order and having an untidy cell. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references [1375]*1375thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 surcharge restored to petitioner’s inmate account. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mercer v Artus, 70 AD3d 1073 [2010]; Matter of Rivera v Napoli, 69 AD3d 1284 [2010]).

Spain, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.3d 1374, 900 N.Y.S.2d 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-bellnier-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack