Harrison v. Axtell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Harrison v. Axtell

75 A. 1100, 76 N.J. Eq. 614, 6 Buchanan 614, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 256

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 28, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 75 A. 1100 (Harrison v. Axtell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Axtell, 75 A. 1100, 76 N.J. Eq. 614, 6 Buchanan 614, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 256 (N.J. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

We concur in the opinion expressed by the ordinary that the respondent Axtell fairly sustained the burden of showing that the will was not the product of undue influence, but of the full and independent judgment of the testatrix, and, for this reason, affirm the decree under review.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—14.

For reversal—Fone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

We concur in the opinion expressed by the ordinary that the respondent Axtell fairly sustained the burden of showing that the will was not the product of undue influence, but of the full and independent judgment of the testatrix, and, for this reason, affirm the decree under review.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—14.

For reversal—Fone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A. 1100, 76 N.J. Eq. 614, 6 Buchanan 614, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-axtell-nj-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack