Harrison v. Alago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrison v. Alago

199 A.D.2d 562, 608 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12417

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 562 (Harrison v. Alago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison v. Alago, 199 A.D.2d 562, 608 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel disclosure of certain documents, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), dated January 12, 1990, as denied his petition in part. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, [563]*563entered August 9, 1989, which denied the defendant’s application to compel disclosure of a certain autopsy report.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Initially, we note that, although the petitioner was granted leave to serve and file a reply brief, his time to do so expired on December 10, 1993.

The petitioner did not demonstrate that he was entitled to the requested information (see, Public Officers Law § 89 [3]; Matter of Wood v Ellison, 196 AD2d 933). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel disclosure of certain documents, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), dated January 12, 1990, as denied his petition in part. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, [563]*563entered August 9, 1989, which denied the defendant’s application to compel disclosure of a certain autopsy report.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Initially, we note that, although the petitioner was granted leave to serve and file a reply brief, his time to do so expired on December 10, 1993.

The petitioner did not demonstrate that he was entitled to the requested information (see, Public Officers Law § 89 [3]; Matter of Wood v Ellison, 196 AD2d 933). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 562, 608 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-v-alago-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack