Harrison v. Adams

257 F. App'x 613
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2007·No. No. 07-6497·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Henry Harrison appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Adams, No. l:06-cv-00501-TSE (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2007; filed Mar. 19, 2007, entered Mar. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrison v. Adams, 257 F. App'x 613 (4th Cir. 2007).

257 F. App'x 613 (Harrison v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related