Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical University of South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical University of South Carolina

479 F. App'x 449

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 1, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1600

StatusPublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 449 (Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical University of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical University of South Carolina, 479 F. App'x 449 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peggy Harrison-Jenkins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Harrison-Jenkins’ complaint. She also appeals various preliminary orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical Univ. of South Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-02551-DCN, 2012 WL 1534711 (D.S.C. Oct. 13, 2011; Feb. 22 & May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peggy Harrison-Jenkins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Harrison-Jenkins’ complaint. She also appeals various preliminary orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison-Jenkins v. Medical Univ. of South Carolina, No. 2:11-cv-02551-DCN, 2012 WL 1534711 (D.S.C. Oct. 13, 2011; Feb. 22 & May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 F. App'x 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-jenkins-v-medical-university-of-south-carolina-ca4-2012.