Harrison, Elizabeth v. Chattanooga Staffing

2019 TN WC 94
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 10, 2019
Docket2018-01-0699
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 94 (Harrison, Elizabeth v. Chattanooga Staffing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison, Elizabeth v. Chattanooga Staffing, 2019 TN WC 94 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Jun 10, 2019

03:48 PM(ET) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA

Elizabeth Harrison, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0699 Employee, )

V. )

Chattanooga Staffing, ) State File No.: 58404-2018 Employer, )

And )

Technology Insurance Co., ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court convened an Expedited Hearing on June 4, 2019. The issue is whether Ms. Harrison is likely to establish at trial that she is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits. Chattanooga Staffing disputes her entitlement to benefits, asserting she chose not to accept its offer of light-duty work.’ For the reasons below, the Court awards temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

While working as a caregiver for Chattanooga Staffing on July 16, 2018, Ms. Harrison experienced a tearing/burning sensation across her neck into her left shoulder while using both arms to move a paraplegic client. She reported the injury, and Chattanooga Staffing instructed her to go to Physicians Care.”

Instead, Ms. Harrison sought treatment with Dr. Andrew Mendoza on July 18, who prescribed medication and provided her with a sling. She then went to Physicians

' Chattanooga Staffing did not dispute her entitlement to temporary total disability benefits from April 9, 2019, forward, which is when Dr. Alex Sielatycki, panel physician, took Ms. Harrison completely off work.

> Ms. Harrison later selected Physicians Care from a panel. Care on July 23, and the provider restricted her to right-arm use only with continued use of the sling as needed.

Physicians Care kept Ms. Harrison on the same restriction until it referred her to Dr. Justin Arnold, an orthopedist, on August 22. However, she also saw Dr. Mendoza on that day, and he retroactively took Ms. Harrison completely off work from July 18 “until she has complete return of function in her L arm and shoulder.” After seeing Dr. Arnold on August 29, he restricted Ms. Harrison to no lifting with her left arm and no overhead work. Both parties offered testimony regarding these restrictions and their application to Ms. Harrison’s work.

Suzanne Jesucat, Director of Chattanooga Staffing, testified through a December 3 written declaration. She learned of Ms. Harrison’s restrictions on August 30 and called her the same day to offer her light-duty beginning on August 31, which Ms. Harrison refused. Ms. Jesucat stated the light-duty consisted of warming meals, performing very light housework, and accompanying a client to doctor appointments. Ms. Harrison testified she does not recall speaking with either Ms. Jesucat or anyone else from Chattanooga Staffing on August 30.

Separate from Ms. Jesucat’s written declaration, a letter signed by her on November 29 provided additional details about the light-duty offered. She stated the “light duty client” was someone Ms. Harrison knew since 2016, who was fully mobile and mostly independent. Ms. Jesucat indicated the work involved two- and three-hour shifts.

Ms. Harrison disputed Ms. Jesucat’s assertions regarding the abilities of this client. She stated that her now-deceased aunt, Annie Mae Jones, was her only permanent client since 2016. Ms. Harrison stated that Ms. Jones suffered a debilitating stroke on July 9, 2018, and afterward she required extensive assistance.

Aside from Ms. Jones, Ms. Harrison’s other clients were “fill-in” clients. When asked about Barbara Kohler, a fill-in client, Ms. Harrison stated that she assisted Ms. Kohler for approximately two to three months in 2017. Even if the unnamed client referenced by Ms. Jesucat were Ms. Kohler, Ms. Harrison stated that caring for her required use of both arms. She stated she performed the following tasks for Ms. Kohler: (1) cooked meals with an iron skillet; (2) cleaned her kitchen; (3) assisted her into and out of the shower and washed her back; (4) performed housecleaning; (5) applied lotion to her body; and, (6) assisted her in dressing, including socks, shoes, and disposable undergarments. Further, Ms. Harrison testified she had to use both arms to assist Ms. Kohler even when seated because Ms. Kohler was “weaving” and “unsteady.”

After Ms. Jesucat’s call to Ms. Harrison on August 30, Chattanooga Staffing stopped her temporary disability benefits on August 31. The parties agreed that Ms.

2 Harrison received temporary partial disability benefits from July 23 through August 31 at the weekly compensation rate of $104.14. However, they agreed her correct compensation rate is $135.30.°

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Standard Applied

At an expedited hearing, Ms. Harrison must present sufficient evidence to prove she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018). The Court holds she did.

Temporary Disability Benefits

Ms. Harrison requested temporary disability benefits. The Court grants her request.

Ms. Harrison is eligible for TPD benefits if she earned less than her average weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A). The Court must consider the reasonableness of Chattanooga Staffing in attempting to return her to work and the reasonableness of Ms. Harrison in failing to return to work. Lasser v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 20, at *14 (may 24, 2018).

Here, Ms. Harrison’s unrebutted testimony was that her aunt was the only permanent client she consistently cared for from 2016 forward, who had a debilitating stroke the week before the July 16, 2018 work injury. Even if the unnamed client referenced by Ms. Jesucat were Ms. Kohler, Ms. Harrison’s unrebutted testimony proved that Ms. Kohler’s caregiver must use both arms to care for her. When considering the testimony and reasonableness of the actions of both parties, the Court finds that Ms. Harrison’s refusal to work the light-duty Chattanooga Staffing offered was reasonable. Therefore, the Court holds she is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits from September 1, 2018, through April 8, 2019.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Chattanooga Staffing shall pay past-due temporary partial disability benefits at the weekly compensation rate of $135.30 in the lump-sum amount of $4,252.29 for the period from September 1, 2018, through April 8, 2019. It shall also pay Ms. Harrison $178.05 for the underpayment from July 23, 2018, through August 31, 2018. As agreed by Chattanooga Staffing, it shall pay past-due temporary total

* Following the Expedited Hearing, Chattanooga Staffing filed a Motion to Reopen Proof. The Court addressed that motion in a separate order. disability benefits from April 9, 2019, through June 10, 2019, which totals $1,217.70. Further, Chattanooga Staffing shall deduct $62.00 for an outstanding child support lien upon receipt of proper documentation and submission of the lien balance, if any, from Ms. Harrison.

2. Chattanooga Staffing shall continue to pay to Ms. Harrison temporary total disability benefits in regular intervals until she is no longer eligible for those benefits by reaching maximum medical improvement, by returning to work at a wage equal to or greater her average weekly wage, or by release without restrictions by Dr. Sielatycki. Chattanooga Staffing’s representative shall immediately notify the Bureau, Ms. Harrison, and her counsel of the intent to terminate temporary disability benefits by filing Form C-26, citing the basis for the termination.

3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(2)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-elizabeth-v-chattanooga-staffing-tennworkcompcl-2019.