Harrison, Earl Anthony

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
DocketWR-89,306-01
StatusPublished

This text of Harrison, Earl Anthony (Harrison, Earl Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison, Earl Anthony, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,306-01

EX PARTE EARL ANTHONY HARRISON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1463292-A IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and

sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal she conviction.

In his first and second grounds, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective and

rendered Applicant’s plea involuntary. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to

relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte

Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for 2

findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s involuntary plea

and ineffective assistance of counsel claims in his first and second grounds. The trial court may use

any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.

After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make further findings of fact and

conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient and his alleged deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant and rendered his plea involuntary. The trial court shall also make

any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 13, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Patterson
993 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harrison, Earl Anthony, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-earl-anthony-texcrimapp-2019.