Harrison, Earl Anthony
This text of Harrison, Earl Anthony (Harrison, Earl Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,306-01
EX PARTE EARL ANTHONY HARRISON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1463292-A IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and
sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal she conviction.
In his first and second grounds, Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective and
rendered Applicant’s plea involuntary. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to
relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115
(Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte
Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for 2
findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s involuntary plea
and ineffective assistance of counsel claims in his first and second grounds. The trial court may use
any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
After reviewing counsel’s response, the trial court shall make further findings of fact and
conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient and his alleged deficient
performance prejudiced Applicant and rendered his plea involuntary. The trial court shall also make
any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the
disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: February 13, 2019 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harrison, Earl Anthony, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-earl-anthony-texcrimapp-2019.