Harrison E. Livingstone v. Little, Brown & Company and John Taylor Williams

838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1502
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1988
Docket19-6260
StatusUnpublished

This text of 838 F.2d 1210 (Harrison E. Livingstone v. Little, Brown & Company and John Taylor Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrison E. Livingstone v. Little, Brown & Company and John Taylor Williams, 838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1502 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

838 F.2d 1210
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harrison E. LIVINGSTONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LITTLE, BROWN & COMPANY and John Taylor Williams, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-2062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 29, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 5, 1988.

Harrison E. Livingstone, appellant pro se.

Stephen Donald Langhoff, Doyle & Langhoff, Molly H. Sherden, Palmer & Dodge, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Our review of the record and the district court's decision reveals that this appeal from that court's order refusing relief on this claim of defamation lacks merit. We affirm the district court's finding that the alleged defamatory statement was not, in fact, made.* Because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny the motion to stay this appeal, and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Livingstone v. Little, Brown & Co., C/A No. 82-719-K (D.Md., May 1, 1986).

AFFIRMED.

*

We express no opinion regarding the district court's conclusion that even if the statement was made, it was absolutely privileged

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 F.2d 1210, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrison-e-livingstone-v-little-brown-company-and-john-taylor-williams-ca4-1988.