Harrisburg v. Baptist

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Harrisburg v. Baptist

27 A. 8, 156 Pa. 526, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1380

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 19, 1893

DocketAppeal, No. 25

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 27 A. 8 (Harrisburg v. Baptist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrisburg v. Baptist, 27 A. 8, 156 Pa. 526, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1380 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

An examination of this record has satisfied us that the affidavit of defence is insufficient to carry the case to the jury on either of the points suggested therein, and henee there was no error in entering judgment against the defendant for the amount of plaintiff’s claim.

The defects in the amended affidavit of defence are so clearly and forcibly pointed out by the learned judge of the common pleas that we deem it unnecessary to do more than affirm the judgment on his opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

An examination of this record has satisfied us that the affidavit of defence is insufficient to carry the case to the jury on either of the points suggested therein, and henee there was no error in entering judgment against the defendant for the amount of plaintiff’s claim.

The defects in the amended affidavit of defence are so clearly and forcibly pointed out by the learned judge of the common pleas that we deem it unnecessary to do more than affirm the judgment on his opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A. 8, 156 Pa. 526, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrisburg-v-baptist-pa-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack