Harris Vs. Harris
This text of 487 P.3d 392 (Harris Vs. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CHRISTINA HARRIS, No. 82326 Appellant, vs. JERMAINE HARRIS, Respondent. FIL JUN 1 0 EL£ CLOT OF
Sy diEF DEPUrY CLEM 4
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order awarding respondent attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Rena G. Hughes, Judge. Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. It appeared that the challenged order may not be substantively appealable. Accordingly, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. She states that dismissal is appropriate on jurisdictional grounds and requests the dismissal or withdrawal of this appeal. The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Department J Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Kelleher & Kelleher, LLC Claflin Law Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk
(th 1947A 04Dgin 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 P.3d 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-vs-harris-nev-2021.