Harris Vs. Harris

487 P.3d 392
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 2021·No. 82326·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHRISTINA HARRIS, No. 82326 Appellant,

vs.

JERMAINE HARRIS,

Respondent. FIL JUN 1 0 EL£ CLOT OF

Sy diEF DEPUrY CLEM 4

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order awarding respondent attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Rena G. Hughes, Judge.

Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. It appeared that the challenged order may not be substantively appealable. Accordingly, this court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. She states that dismissal is appropriate on jurisdictional grounds and requests the dismissal or withdrawal of this appeal. The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.

, C.J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Department J Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge Kelleher & Kelleher, LLC Claflin Law Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(th 1947A 04Dgin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris Vs. Harris, 487 P.3d 392 (Neb. 2021).

487 P.3d 392 (Harris Vs. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.