Harris v. Williams

New York Court of Chancery

Harris v. Williams

10 Paige Ch. 108

DecidedJanuary 30, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Paige Ch. 108 (Harris v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Williams, 10 Paige Ch. 108 (N.Y. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The defendant in this case is not entitled to costs. The complainant was entitled to the discovery wuthout suit, as it was material to the maintenance of his rights at law. And it having been refused by the defendant without any sufficient excuse, and the complainant having obtained it by the aid of this court, the defendant must bear his own costs of the answer and of his other proceedings in this suit.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The defendant in this case is not entitled to costs. The complainant was entitled to the discovery wuthout suit, as it was material to the maintenance of his rights at law. And it having been refused by the defendant without any sufficient excuse, and the complainant having obtained it by the aid of this court, the defendant must bear his own costs of the answer and of his other proceedings in this suit.

Order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Paige Ch. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-williams-nychanct-1843.