Harris v. Whitmore
66 Ill. 144
This text of 66 Ill. 144 (Harris v. Whitmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. Whitmore, 66 Ill. 144 (Ill. 1872).
Opinion
In this ease the declaration counted upon the note, as well- as the award which the arbitrators had made for its payment. Admitting the award was void for uncertainty, as claimed by counsel for defendant, we see no reason why the note should not have been admitted in evidence, and no reason is suggested by counsel for defendant. The judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 Ill. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-whitmore-ill-1872.