Harris v. Whinney

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 24, 2009
• Docket: 09-1211
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1211

JASPER HARRIS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL WHINNEY, Director of Department of Social Services; REBECCA CLINE, Department of Social Services; KELLY HARRIS, Department of Social Services; M. L. CROSS, Department of Social Services; SARAH VAUGHAN, Department of Social Services; FRANCHESCA JOHNSON, Department of Social Services; DEBORAH CHEATHAM, Department of Social Services; NICHOLAS F. SIMOPOULOS, Esquire,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00296-RLW)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jasper Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jasper Harris, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his suit for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Harris v. Whinney, No. 3:08-cv-00296-RLW (E.D. Va. Jan.

23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED